The Colorado Senate approved legislation yesterday that would hand out even more marriage-like benefits to same-sex couples…without actually calling it “marriage.” The civil union bill (SB 172) passed 23-12 and now heads to the GOP-controlled House for vote.
Marriage-like rights outlined in the civil union bill include: the right to be involved in medical decisions affecting partners, the right to visit a partner in the hospital, the right to inherit property from a partner after a death, and the right to survivors’ benefits or workers’ compensation claims.
Pundits are arguing, however, that Colorado State already has a protection in place (the Designated Beneficiaries Agreement Act of 2009) for all of the above and that the new civil union bill is redundant.
“That they’re now lobbying for a bill that’s redundant in existing law demonstrates that SB 172 is more about redefining marriage than hospital visitation and property ownership,” says Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of issue analysis at CitizenLink. “Civil unions are marriage under another name. Marriage should be protected for what it gives to children—their best chance at a married mom and dad.”
In 2006, Colorado voters amended the state Constitution to protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman. That same year, they also rejected domestic partnerships.
“Many of us—CitizenLink included—support the right of unmarried persons to have who they want by their bedside at the hospital,” Earll said. “People need to know they already have that right — along with many others.”