Hawaii Appeals Court Rejects Religious Justification for B&B that Refused Room to Lesbian Couple

Hawaii Appeals Court Rejects Religious Justification for B&B that Refused Room to Lesbian Couple

- in National
1302
0
Diane Cervelli and Taeko Bufford
Diane Cervelli and Taeko Bufford

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii this week affirmed a lower court ruling against a Hawaii bed and breakfast that denied a room to a lesbian couple because of their sexual orientation. Aloha Bed & Breakfast, whose owner says same-sex relationships “defile our land,” is represented by the anti-LGBT legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, which has claimed a religious justification for the discrimination. The issue of whether religion gives a business a right to discriminate is also at issue in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The court today affirmed that there is no excuse for discrimination,” Lambda Legal Senior Attorney Peter Renn said. “Hawaii law is crystal clear: if you operate a business, you are open to all.”

State law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.

“The court saw this case for what it was and rightly refused to allow the business owner to use religion as a fig leaf for discrimination,” Renn said.

In December 2011, Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit in the First Circuit Court of Hawaii on behalf of Diane Cervelli and Taeko (Ty) Bufford, a lesbian couple who had been denied a room at Aloha Bed & Breakfast in Hawaii Kai. The couple had contacted the B&B because it was near the home of a close friend who had just had a baby. However, when the B&B owner learned Diane and Ty are a same-sex couple, she refused to rent them a room. Diane and Ty contacted the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission (HCRC), and in the course of the subsequent HCRC investigation, the owner admitted that she turned the couple away because they were lesbians, stating that she believed same-sex relationships are “detestable” and that they “defile our land.”

The First Circuit Court ruled for Cervelli and Bufford in April 2013, and Aloha B&B then appealed to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. The lawyers for Aloha B&B have argued throughout the case that the religious views of the business owner permit the business to refuse to rent a room to a same-sex couple. The trial court rejected that argument and the appeals court today again rejected that argument.

“I can’t tell you how much it hurt to be essentially told, ‘we don’t do business with your kind.’ It still stings to this day,” Bufford said.  “We thought the days when business owners would say ‘we’re open to the public – but not to you’ was a thing of the past. You don’t have to change your beliefs, but you do have to follow the law just as everyone else does. No one should have to experience what we experienced, and we’re grateful the courts in Hawaii have agreed. It terrifies me to think of what might happen if the U.S. Supreme Court were to decide that businesses do have a religious license to discriminate,” the issue at stake in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

“Diane and Ty’s experience shows just how pernicious and damaging a religious license to discriminate would be,” Lambda Legal CEO Rachel B. Tiven explained. “There is no limit to the places where LGBT people would be harmed if businesses were granted the right to discriminate. It would gut anti-discrimination laws and could turn every-day, routine events into nightmares of denial, rejection and stigmatization for LGBT people.” Lambda Legal filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Masterpiece Cakeshop marshaling a broad range of examples that painfully and powerfully demonstrate the discrimination LGBT people already experience from cradle to grave.

Lambda Legal Staff Attorney Peter Renn is representing Diane Cervelli and Taeko Bufford with co-counsel Lindsay McAneeley of Carlsmith Ball LLP. The Executive Director of the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission also joined the case, and he is represented by HCRC Chief Counsel Robin Wurtzel.

The case is Cervelli v. Aloha Bed & Breakfast. Read the opinion here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/legal-docs/cervelli_hi_20180223_opinion. Read about the case here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/cervelli-v-aloha-bed-and-breakfast.

Read Lambda Legal’s amicus brief in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/legal-docs/us_masterpiece-cakes_20171030_amicus-brief.

Comments

comments

Also On The Web

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.